101
(and not Dalmatians)
Minisinoo
Summary:
Scott on sex, and men, and relationships. And Romance novels.
ADULT, c. 4900 words (movieverse)
Warning:
Please don't read this if you're easily offended. It isn't -
to my mind - crude (I detest crude), but it is blunt and one
person's idea of blunt may constitute 'crude' to another.
Notes:
I owe a debt of gratitude to close male friends who've been open and honest
about men and sex down through the years. Everything male-gender
related that Scott says, I've heard come out of the mouth of at least one
male of the species - if not necessarily with the same biting humor.
Dedicated with love and fondness to my best friend: my husband of
fifteen years.
The way I learned about women - really learned something useful
- was from my mother's Romance novels. Genre Romance, capital-R,
as in Harlequin, Silhouette, and all the other publishing lines -
books that authors turn out four a year to a particular formula for big
paychecks because the things sell like mad. Some of them are even
penned by men writing under a female pseudonym because they sell,
and they're so damn predictable that anyone can do it. I should probably
be ashamed to admit that I ever touched one, much less that I learned anything
useful from one, but it's true. What I learned, though, isn't what
you'd think.
Romance novels come in flavors like ice cream. We have the strawberry
romantic with purple-pink prose. Everything is described in sugarcoated
allusion, some of which is damn funny - lots of heaving breasts and
throbbing manhoods. I always thought my 'manhood' was my gender identity,
not what hung between my legs. What hangs between my legs is a cock,
dick, or penis, depending on how polite I'm feeling and what state of arousal
I'm in. But it's not only what these novels call certain anatomical
parts, but how they describe actions that cracks me up. "He
devoured her mouth," for instance. That always makes me want to ask,
"Does he have ketchup or mustard with that?"
Okay, so I'm an iconoclast. Sue me.
Strawberry-gag flavors aside, we also have the Romance variety that
gets a bit more daring: chocolate vanilla swirl. "He withdrew
his shaft and thrust into her again . . . " A descriptive euphemism instead
of an allusive one. And last, we have the mocha-espresso graphic
novels (and why is chocolate always associated with sin, anyway?), which
amounts to a woman's version of Penthouse Letters. And here, at last,
we find plain Anglo-Saxon English: cock. Not that the
man who has one acts any more like a real guy, but (as I learned later)
that's not really the point. Of course male porn has its own set
of sex clichés, too, they just tend to be different clichés.
You do not 'eat someone out.' That also makes me think of ketchup
and mustard, but women smell more like day-old tuna (sorry, it's true),
which requires mayonnaise and pickles. And it's
come, dammit,
not cum. Misspelling isn't erotic - it's misspelling.
That's my problem, of course. The clichés make me laugh;
they don't turn me on. I'm like any other guy; I have a direct connection
between my eyes and my penis. Visual cues turn me on far more than
verbal ones, even if I don't necessarily want them to: one of my
female students in a tight blouse can be as distracting as hell.
Blame my wiring.
Women really have no clue what a bitch testosterone is.
But every guy has to decide, preferably sooner rather than later, which
head he's going to think with, and I decided a long time ago that it wouldn't
be the one in my pants. I am not my hormones even if, at sixteen,
it sure felt that way.
In any case, I certainly didn't learn about sex from my mother's Romance
novels. I had better sources for that, ranging from my father's terse
and antiseptic explanations, to the surprisingly frank priest who'd directed
our parish youth group (and where he'd gotten the experience, he never
confessed), to furtive fumblings under the bleachers at football games
or in the choir loft on Sunday nights after youth group. I still
remember the first time I discovered that breasts are soft and squishy.
Don't laugh; it's not self-evident. I didn't have a sister, certainly
didn't remember nursing, and sure as hell don't have a pair of my own.
How was I to know?
I was fourteen, a freshman, and had been going with the same girl for
about three months - Teresa Diaz. She had beautiful black hair
and skin like cinnamon. Holding hands was exciting. Kissing
was heaven. But I'd only just worked up nerve to try sticking my
tongue in her mouth. Neither of us knew what on earth we were doing,
and it was more shocking than erotic the first time. I recall thinking,
"Okay, my tongue's in here; now what? And am I supposed to swallow
her saliva?"
See, I was never meant to write Romance. There's nothing romantic
about slobber.
In any case, by my Night of Discovery, I'd figured out (more or less)
what to do with my tongue, and I was ready to try my luck with my hands.
It was homecoming and I'd taken Teresa to the game; she wore a tight sweater
and I spent half the night looking at her chest when she wasn't looking
at me - and was really glad that I had on loose pants. I finally
got her to go walking around the track that circled the football field.
"Parading," we called it. Parading usually ended under the bleachers,
if you were lucky - which I was. She liked me. And I liked
her - and not just because I was fourteen, horny, and curious.
Being around her initiated the whole butterfly thing in my stomach, and
she made me laugh, too. But it's way too easy for men (or boys) to
separate love and sex, and that night, I was more interested in the latter,
or as close as I could get. Which meant groping in the shadows under
the bleachers and pretending there wasn't another couple thirty feet away,
doing the same damn thing.
So that's how I found out that breasts are soft, and she found out that
erections are hard, and we never got much further than that. She
was a good Catholic girl. But it was a revelation.
So what did I learn from Romance novels? Three very important
things. But before I continue, I suppose I should explain how I wound
up reading them. I don't remember now why I picked up the first.
Probably I was bored, out of library books, and looking for something I
could laugh at - and a little curious to see if there were any Naughty
Bits. Which there were. (My mother tended to the mocha-espresso
flavor, which might bother me if I stopped to think about it, but I steadfastly
refuse to go there. She's my mother.) So I found the
Naughty Bits by select skimming, read them, and about died laughing.
But I confess I was young and ignorant and more inclined to be turned on,
too, than I would be now. So I went looking for more. And I
discovered that the Naughty Bits were usually in about the same place (making
them easier to find if you just wanted to get down to business?), and I
also found myself reading a little of the narrative around the Naught Bits,
and then a little more . . . .
I finally read one from cover to cover. It didn't take long, maybe
one Saturday afternoon hiding in my room lest anyone discover what I was
doing. My little brother Alex would never have let me live it down.
But what fascinated me about it was the feeling of having turned a corner
on a familiar street and wound up somewhere I had never traveled.
Girls had been a rather nebulous category for me - fascinating, but
elusive to my comprehension. Not having a sister, and being raised
in a staunchly Catholic and conservative family, I'd been force-fed the
traditional male programming since the day I'd been born the eldest son
and heir apparent to my father's Air Force career. Blue clothes,
baseballs, Matchbox accessories, and action-figure-of-the-week. And
I was happy with that. I enjoyed then, and still enjoy, fairly predictable
male activities. I just no longer limit myself to them. But
in any case, all that had translated to a lack of contact with girls beyond
a few of the androgynous ones who liked dinosaurs, science class, and racing
bicycles - which was fine at nine, but when we all hit puberty, things
got complicated. I couldn't look at them as 'just playmates' anymore,
and I can still recall being fascinated when I first spotted the tell-tale
outline of a bra strap under Alice Jensen's white Tyrannosaurus Rex t-shirt.
I'd suddenly found myself wishing I could switch places with the dinosaur.
And it was around the same age that I also found out my penis had an apparent
life of its own. My father had once given me the cryptic advice of
not wearing pants that were too tight, and not sitting with my legs crossed
'like a girl.' At twelve, I'd assumed he just didn't want me looking
like a sissy. At fourteen, I understood. The less pressure
on the nether regions, the less likely one was to have an awkward situation
in public. Years later, Jean confessed to me that when she'd been
fourteen (with only an elder sister about), she wouldn't have been able
to tell if a guy had an erection . . . and probably wouldn't have thought
to look in the first place. Yet in the grips of the embarrassing-but-inevitable,
you're certain that everyone notices.
In any case, at fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen, I wasn't the only boy
confused by the romantic opposition (which is how girls felt to us at that
point), but I must have been born a strategist. The first step to
winning a battle is to out-think your opponent, and that means you must
understand her. Which is, I know now, a very male way of thinking
about it. But that was part of what I learned. And Romance
novels became my chief sources of information. I studied them.
Very logically. I made outlines of the plot patterns, and character
sketches of the various hero and heroine types, and even dissected how
the heroes wooed and won the heroines in the hopes that I could figure
out what to say, in order to get girls into bed.
And the conclusion I finally came to was that I was going about it all
the wrong way. But I didn't reach that conclusion from my outlines.
I came to it by the simple expedient of asking a classmate in the lunchroom
why she read the damn things. Of course, I didn't admit that I'd
read any. "They're not realistic," I told her. "The guys in
there are not real guys!"
She'd looked at me, blinked, and replied, "Of course they're not.
I read 'em to get away from real guys."
Sometimes revelation sneaks up and taps you on the shoulder, sometimes
it curls around your feet - and sometimes it just wacks you over the
head.
After that, I went back and read some of the books again and tried to
look through the portrayals of the heroes (or the heroines for that
matter) to understand the mind on the other side. I stopped looking
for a series of tips and clues and paint-by-number instructions for getting
some. Despite my ostensible goal, my initial foray into the study
of Romance novels hadn't been to understand girls, but to figure out how
to get what I wanted out of them. Now, I began to see them as books
that revealed what they wanted out of me. More or less.
Which meant that I stopped looking at it all as potential battle strategy.
And that was the first thing that Romance novels taught me:
that I was trying to learn about women in all the wrong ways, and for all
the wrong reasons. Did I want to be the kind of guy whom girls read
Romance novels to get away from? I know I still wind up filling that
bill some days, but hopefully it's only a temporary loss of my mind.
The second thing that Romance novels taught me was that women aren't
so alien as I sometimes thought. We're all human, and at the root
of things, the differences one notices depend on where one draws the lines.
I have more in common with Jean than I have with Logan, but what I share
with Jean is very different from what I share with Ororo. And Jean
and Ororo have little in common beyond their commitment to the team and
to our kids. So categories are what you choose to make them, and
gender is just one arbitrary division. That doesn't mean it's not
based on very real, and biologically-motivated, differences, but it
is only one way of looking at people.
The third and last thing I learned from Romance novels is that they
tend to describe sexual firsts, or at least something unusual. I
guess that makes sense - you describe the significant, not the ordinary.
But that's misleading, leaving us with warped notions of what sex is like
most of the time. I had some bordering-on-disastrous sexual experiences
in high school and, later, in college, and they happened because of unreasonable
expectations. Sex is rarely apocalyptic, even - maybe
especially
- the first time. You don't know each other's preferences and
you're as self-conscious as hell, worried about everything. If it
weren't for the infamous fire-of-desire, I don't think I'd have tried for
two with most of the women I've slept with. My first times were all
either unmemorable (aside from it being the first) or an hysterical muddle
for some reason - and that includes the first time with Jean.
I fell off the backseat of the car on my ass, for pete's sake. We
were able to laugh about it at the time . . . because we were friends already.
And it ended up being pretty good sex, but the situation had still been
as funny as hell and it was almost a year before we had anything approaching
great
sex.
You can't have great sex without trust - and that takes time to
build, even if you're friends going in. You can't worry about how
you look in the throes of passion, or about of what's coming out of your
mouth when you're a feather's breath from orgasm, or whether something
you try might offend your partner to the point of driving her off.
I've only had two relationships that got to that level of trust, and but
one that was open enough to yield a sexual experience I might truly call
apocalyptic.
And it wasn't a 'first' of anything.
It was one hundred and one, in fact - the hundred and first time
that Jean and I had sex. Yes, I'd actually kept track. Not
for any particular reason, just as one of those weird things you do like
count ceiling tiles or paperclips. I started counting at eleven by
putting a penny in a jar for every time we had sex. Of course, I
had to decide if I'd count every time literally - as in every orgasm
- or simply each encounter, and settled on each encounter. Honestly,
though, once was typically enough and I think I can count on one hand the
number of times we've had sex more than once in a day, and then it was
usually once in the morning and once at night. At first, I worried
that maybe I wasn't fully satisfying Jean and would push her for two, until
she got pissed at me one night and kicked me off the bed. She told
me that she was not multi-orgasmic, didn't feel a need to be
multi-orgasmic - regardless of what Cosmo would have us believe
- and trying to make her come twice in as many hours just annoyed
her. Her nipples tickled afterwards and she didn't want them touched.
The first of many lessons in honesty. And it's honesty that builds
trust.
Lesson number two in honesty surprised me, and fundamentally altered
my definition of 'sex.' Penetration hurt Jean. Of course I
knew the first time usually hurt a woman, and even the second or third
- but the fifteenth? The thirtieth? Jean wasn't a virgin
when we first had sex, but she wasn't far off because she hadn't found
it terribly pleasant. She might be tall - taller than me, in
fact, by half an inch - but her vagina was narrow, and I was prone
to premature ejaculation from too many rushed adolescent experiences .
. . which a tight fit didn't help. By the time I got inside with
all the stops and starts (it felt more like parking a car than anything
juicy in those Romance novels), I was already too close to coming.
Two or three thrusts and that was the end of that. So penetration
continued to hurt her for months until it got to the point that I couldn't
enjoy intercourse either. It's just not a turn-on to watch your lover
wince. She'd clench her muscles in anticipation of pain, which just
made it worse. We wound up doing everything but penetration for much
of the time for our first nine months until she confided to me at one point
that it might take having a baby to widen her passage before sex stopped
being painful. That was not encouraging. But I loved her.
I wasn't about to leave her for what, in the end, was really a small thing
(no pun intended). So I enlarged my definition of 'sex,' and we worked
at relaxing her enough until entering her no longer hurt. I still
remember the night she eased herself down on me with a startled smile because
there was no pain, and I didn't come as soon as I was inside. After
that, things began to click.
But that took nine months. That's the reality, not the
fantasy. Not the Romance novel. Yet in the end, I don't think
apocalyptic sex would have been possible without the honesty and trust
that those nine months taught us.
Number one hundred and one came at just over ten months. We'd
recently become engaged, and I'd been keeping track with my pennies -
though I never told Jean that. She'd have hit me because she'd have
thought I was objectifying her, or sex, or both. But I wasn't.
I was just counting because I'm anal sometimes. And because I had
been counting, and we'd passed the magic one hundred, it seemed like I
ought to do something to make the next time special. She wouldn't
have to know why. It was just for me, a marker of sorts. I'd
never been with any woman long enough to reach fifty times, much less one
hundred. I'd never wanted to be.
So I devised something elaborate and romantic: made reservations
for dinner, got a bottle of very good wine for afterwards, even had plans
to seduce her in the Jacuzzi after most of the kids were in bed.
That Jacuzzi was Jean's one requested indulgence at the mansion, and Ororo
had backed her up on it. What is it about the X-chromosome and hot
baths? In any case, we had a Jacuzzi now as common property, and
even the boys liked it - but there was a number-coded lock on the
door because I'd put it there. And if people came to use it when
the lock was tripped . . . well, they could draw their own conclusions.
The kids knew all about the birds and the bees, and when you play Residence
Hall Parents, it's hard to hide your private life. Nor was I foolish
enough to assume they were abstaining; I sure as hell hadn't at that age.
We do, in fact, run a sex education weekend once a year for new students.
It tends to have them giggling at the outset, shocked about an hour into
it, and talking honestly by Sunday afternoon. We'd simply laid down
the law that there would be no shacking up, that opposite genders couldn't
be in the same room with the door locked, and that they had to be back
inside the mansion by a certain hour. But I'd be damned if I'd prowl
the halls and check to see who was giggling in the closets. There's
a point beyond which you have to let kids go and trust that they can act
with a modicum of responsibility. That's my theory anyway.
The guys know precisely what I'd do to anybody who got one of the
girls pregnant. They also know they can get a condom from me if they
need it, and I won't ask them questions except to tell them how to put
it on if it's the first request. Most pregnancies that occur despite
a condom are the fault of improper use, though the guy usually swears up
and down that he knew what he was doing because we don't dare admit to
a lack of knowledge in that department. So I tell the boys, and let
them roll their eyes at me impatiently. And maybe one or two go away
knowing more than they had before.
In any case, and back to my seduction scenario, everything came to naught.
'The best laid plans of mice and men . . . .'
It was in the early days of the X-Men. I think we'd gone on a
half-dozen missions over the course of eight months, and most of those
had amounted to collecting new mutants for the school. This time,
on the very night I'd made all my plans, the professor called us together
to send us after Sabretooth . We didn't know then who Sabretooth was; he
hadn't yet joined Magneto. We simply had news of a 'Bigfoot' around
the Minneapolis-St. Paul region, and the native people there, the Menominee
and the Ojibway, were calling him a cannibal spirit who ate part of his
prey and left the rest in various states of dismemberment. Native
and non-native residents alike were terrified. The professor feared
it was a mutant, and we could tell he was nervous of sending us after someone,
or something, that so obviously was not a confused kid. "Be
very, very careful," he'd warned us when we left.
I almost lost Jean that night, which made me realize just how damn green
we all were. If there hadn't been three of us, he'd have butchered
us. As it was, he scratched me good and came within inches of taking
off Jean's face. In a panic, I tore into him with an optic blast
that should have killed him, and that was how we discovered he had regenerative
capability. I think I'd call that fight a draw. He drove us
off, tails between our legs, but there were no more reports of a Bigfoot
in Minnesota after that.
So we came home with me wounded and feeling like a failure as a leader,
Jean shaken, and Ororo upset at the violence that we'd resorted to, just
to get out of the encounter alive. After debriefing, Jean patched
me up and we found ourselves in the Jacuzzi anyway at three in the morning
- with the bottle of wine but no dinner. I'm not sure I could've
eaten anything after what I'd seen of Sabretooth's victims anyway.
I'd never witnessed death up close and bloody like that. Jean had
taken me to the hot tub to make me relax, wounded or not, and between wine
on an empty stomach, the hot water, and our adrenaline rush, we were lost
fast. Sex began as an affirmation of life in the face of death -
or whatever psychobabble you want to hang on it. The plain fact was
that I was as horny as hell and drunk. And I needed to fuck her to
reassure myself that she was still with me. But even more, I needed
to hold her in the circle of my arms, safe, and to feel myself contained
in her body, surrounded and alive.
That's where apocalyptic sex begins. It's not what you do or the
elaborateness of your plans. It's the emotion behind it, the need,
the ability to completely let go. It's about trust, at least for
me. Appropriate reciprocal vulnerability. So we had mind-blowing
sex on the steps of the hot tub and there was absolutely nothing unusual
about it in terms of what we did, nothing we hadn't done three dozen times
before except in the full release of our inhibitions. I didn't even
worry about my eyes because she'd put my visor on me. She sat me
on the steps, wrapped me up in her arms and settled down on top, held me
inside her while we said a lot of quiet things about what we wanted in
life, and needed, and dreamed about. I'd never have believed that
I could hold a coherent conversation while I was inside Jean, but I did.
And it felt right. Not rushed. Not strange. I'd asked
her to marry me a few months before, but on that night, I think it finally
came home to us both that we were a we forever. I married
her in my soul and mind and heart. The rest is just a formality.
I'll give her a real ceremony some day because I know she wants it, but
it's no longer so high on our priority list.
At some point we did finally shut up, or at least quit trying to be
coherent. She started to move on me and let me play with her breasts,
and our words turned into noise. It built very slow, and with the
kind of relaxed abandon that's extremely hard for me to achieve.
No performance anxiety, no concerns about hurting her - either from
the sex itself or with my eye-blasts. The tension residing within
me since the battle coalesced in the pit of my belly and crawled down into
my groin. I bloomed inside her from a content pleasure to an almost
painful sensation. It didn't take long after that, sucking and licking
bared, wet skin, making waves in the water, hands all over. At one
point, I couldn't get enough pressure with her on top and pushed her up
against the tub wall to rock hard into her, full focus of exquisite tension
in six inches until my whole world shattered. She bit me when she
came, the only time she's ever done that, and I shouted, which I never
do, either. But I also don't usually feel like the top of my skull
is about to fly off and every nerve in my body is burning. Her mind
reached out to mine, driven by the explosion of orgasm, and we fused.
Not Jean, not Scott, but some conglomerate Jean-Scott creature that had
a power of its own, and a purpose that went beyond what we could achieve
individually. I am more because she's with me, and I'd like to think
she's more because she has me to support her. That mental link has
never faded. The orgasm was gone in 30 seconds, maybe a minute, but the
link remained. It's not a link by which I know what she's thinking,
or can read her mind. It's just a presence, as if her body lies against
me every second of the day. Unnerving at first, but wonderful.
That's why I'm no longer in much of a hurry to get married. She
lives in my head. I don't need a ring, on my hand or hers, to make
us any more united. She gives me back to myself, makes me whole,
and I do the same for her. Nothing turns me on more than to watch
her work - really work, completely unaware that a world exists outside
her microscopes and data results. I think it's charming, and I don't
need to hang on her, or be the center of her attention twenty-four hours
a day because I'm already the center of her world, and she's mine.
At day's end, sex or no sex, we curl up in bed together and fall asleep
butt to butt. I need that. I never sleep well when she's gone.
"And two shall be made one flesh." It's more than words, but there's
no short cut to get there. Sex alone can't bring intimacy.
It's just two sets of genitalia rubbing against each other with a slightly
messy exchange of body fluids - a little ridiculous when you think
about it, but fun if there's caring, or frightening and humiliating if
there isn't. It's almost never apocalyptic. But if the trust
is there, and the vulnerability, then once in a blue moon, the apocalyptic
happens, even when not making love to a telepath.
But you've got to be together long enough to reach one hundred and one
- or three hundred and forty-seven, and counting.